No but i understand what you mean
but it's not what i've understood in first place with the poll
well, it wasn't "already in place". There was just no discussion about it and so people used it. And now we have the discussion for that topic
same went for the second tardis
people started practicing it until some of us talked with each other and said it would be best to ban it
okay about that, but the poll is like "Choose between this two options" not "Choose to keep that or not" it's basically what we did with second Tardis to choose if we keep it or not
there was no "keep it" with the second tardis. There was a "are we gonna let people use it?" and it's exactly the same here
the problem is just that we mostly don't have a real discussion. And when we do, it takes us weeks to get there and inbetween we have that "grey zone" were people use it without it being talked about
my problem regarding all of that is that since the beginning the poll is for me a ''choose between two options'' not a ''are we gonna let people use it?"
that's why it doesn't seems fair with my point of view
but with your's i fully understand why it seems all legit
Anything unchanged after the deadline stays.
Can't call into the national voting the day after and have them change it.
I even let the dead line be up for an additional 4 hours.
And the options were to enforce start at New Game or allow the other option.
So I don't see where you're coming from Nekin :/
I mean, I already said before my vote could be counted as "vote 2" in case an equality appears if it helps. That's why I didn't change it. I totally understand what you mean by not changing the votes. I'm not comparing this to a national voting though but whatever, I get your point and there's no point on discussing it. But pls, consider that I suggested that to resolve a potential problem...
There is no problem though.
The advantage option required a majority vote.