Gaulish Gaming Banquet: editor

adrientd

And **RwTeam** assigns a node to a geometry in the dictionary

pegperegogaucho

so; add new reference to **_clones** -> append new **Dong** in **RwTeam** and then do what with the **RwTeamDictionary ** exactly?

adrientd

You do nothing with RwTeamDictionary

adrientd

unless you want to add new kind of geometry

adrientd

unless you want to add new kind of geometry

pegperegogaucho

no no no no, enough bing bangs bong ding dong dangs and fings for now :monkaINSANE:

adrientd

bing bing bong bong

pegperegogaucho

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k85mRPqvMbE

pegperegogaucho

pegperegogaucho

@adrientd when i build this, i get error "binary '==': no operator found which takes a left-hand operand of type 'kobjref' (or there is no acceptable conversion)" do you know of any other method of getting the position of something in an array? :PauseChamp:

adrientd

Yeah, kobjref has no comparison operator with pointers, only with itself.

adrientd

Maybe try this: `std::find_if(clm->_clones.begin(), clm->_clones.end(), [oaclone1](kobjref &ref) {return ref.get() == oaclone1;});`

adrientd

Another simplier solution would be to create temporarily a kobjref, like that: `std::find(clm->_clones.begin(), clm->_clones.end(), kobjref(oaclone1));`

adrientd

But that might cause a reference count increase and decrease for nothing (even tho performance is not priority).

pegperegogaucho

pegperegogaucho

what do you think about the approach?

pegperegogaucho

i guess since _clones and dongs are the same size, there is one dong for each _clone in the same order?

adrientd

Yes, it should be in the same order

adrientd

That's the best approach of course

pegperegogaucho

👍

#editor