| PegPeregoGaucho | 🤔 |
| NoTeefy | Yes they do, you can‘t buy desktop/gaming cpu‘s with more than 22/24 cores atm afaik |
| PegPeregoGaucho | Yeah |
| PegPeregoGaucho | AMD has some nice cpus ^^ |
| NoTeefy | Yup, got an AMD aswell atm |
| PegPeregoGaucho | I dont :/ |
| NoTeefy | The quality tends to be a bit higher with Intel but I‘m not willing to pay for those prices on their cpus with more than 4 cores; they are way too expensive |
| NoTeefy | Had an overclocked i7-7700k @4.9 GHz, now a Ryzen 2700X undervolted @3.9 GHz |
| PegPeregoGaucho | Im using an i7 7700k rn |
| NoTeefy | Not gonna lie, both of them are excellent but I prefer the AMD one for its cores with the tasks I need it for. My old Intel CPU is still the strongest single-core CPU and really good for single-core games like CS. But nowadays the modern game engines go for multicore > singlecore optimisations which is kinda nice |
| NoTeefy | you can then have one cpu for all desired tasks 😄 |
| yarnfang | From what I've heard Intel was slacking due to their god complex. And now AMD has has caught up and Intel are in high panic mode :) |
| yarnfang | Which is neat. |
| NoTeefy | Gives some competition, but AMD will never catch up with NVIDIA with GPUs |
| NoTeefy | Well depends on the fact if they go for a useless technology like ray-tracing or not |
| NoTeefy | If they don't they have good chances with producing better GPUs in the future^^ |
| yarnfang | Useless? Have you seen Minecraft with raytracing dude? 5fps!!! |
| yarnfang | Now that's PC gaming :) |
| PegPeregoGaucho | |
| PegPeregoGaucho | @yarnfang rip |